What are the repercussions here? If Apple were enforcing patents on ground breaking and unique new inventions that had taken several years and stacks of cash to develop and if, like in pharmaceutics, Apple required several years of market monopoly to recoup those investments, then the idea of the richest and most powerful company in the world suing a competitor over such feature infringement might not be met with such revolt. Raise your hand if you think that's what's happening here. Yeah, me neither.
What's going on here is this; The richest and most powerful company in the world, is suing their sole profitable competitor for imitating a few cool features that reflect a very small portion of the smartphone experience, features that shouldn't have been patentable in the first place.
Patent 087: A Rectangular White Phone - Seriously?
Patent 677: A Rectangular Black Phone - Hmmm... must be a larger model...
Patent 305: Squarish App Icons - In the famous works of Jimmy Falon imitating Adam Sandler, "Who are the ad wizards who came up with that one?"
Apple has stacks and stacks of these ludicrous patients on file. One can only imagine that they probably have some that involve using electricity to power the phone, using a microphone and speaker to send and receive voice signals, and, of course, using a phone as a paperweight.
But take comfort Apple, if Microsoft, Cicso, IBM, and half a dozen other tech companies have taught us anything, it's that you don't need to keep coming up innovative and new ideas in order to stay on top of your industry. Oh wait-a-minute, nevermind.
No comments:
Post a Comment